|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
Vivace was entered into FC by Chopin after crossing out Allegretto. The composer could have been considering a more pronounced indication suggesting the different nature of this Mazurka with respect to the first and fourth ones, described as Allegretto non tanto and Allegretto, respectively. Cf. changes to the tempo/character indications in the autograph of the Preludes, Op. 28. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Changes of tempo markings |
||||||||
|
b. 1-3
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In bars 1 and 3, in the main text we omit the slurs present in FC (→GE), being part of the triplet marking – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. They are absent in FE, although it seems unlikely that Chopin would have bothered to remove them while proofreading this edition. In subsequent bars, none of the sources includes such slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Triplet slurs |
||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
Difference in the wording of the title – see the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The absence of the dedication in FC (→GE) suggests that the decision concerning a dedication came relatively late in the publishing process of the Mazurkas. See the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Dedications |
||||||||
|
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
to a1 is present only in